While the US wasn't looking, Russia and Iran began carving out a bigger role in Afghanistan

Link to original article

By ,

KABUL — Iran and Russia have stepped up challenges to U.S. power in Afghanistan, American and Afghan officials say, seizing on the uncertainty of future U.S. policy to expand ties with the Taliban and weaken the country’s Western-backed government.

The moves come as tensions have flared between the United States, Iran and Russia over the conflict in Syria, and officials worry that the fallout could hurt Afghanistan’s chances for peace. For years, Iran and Russia have pushed for a U.S. withdrawal.

Now, as the Taliban gains ground and the White House appears to lack a clear Afghan policy, Iran and Russia have boosted support for insurgents and sidelined the United States from regional diplomacy on the war.

Russia on Friday will host high-level talks on Afghanistan with Iranian, Pakistani and Chinese diplomats, the Kremlin said. But the United States, irked by Moscow’s recent outreach to the Taliban, has not confirmed whether it will attend.

Russia has “begun to publicly legitimize the Taliban,” and recent Russian and Iranian actions in Afghanistan “are to undermine the United States and NATO,” the top commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Army Gen. John Nicholson Jr., said in Senate testimony in February.

[Pentagon identifies U.S. Special Forces soldier killed fighting the Islamic State in Afghanistan]

The United States has roughly 8,400 troops in Afghanistan, most of whom are part of the NATO mission to assist Afghan forces. The remainder are part of a counterterrorism operation to target al-Qaeda and a local affiliate of the Islamic State.

Nicholson said Iran and Russia “are communicating about the efforts” to support Taliban insurgents, and that Russia has “become more assertive over the past year.”

“We know there is a dialogue. We know there is a relationship between Iran and Russia” in Afghanistan, he said. And Iran, which shares a long, porous border with Afghanistan, “is directly supporting the Taliban” in the western part of the country, he said.

While Russia and Shiite Iran appear to be unlikely allies of a hard-line Sunni group such as the Taliban, the two countries have for years played the different sides of the conflict. Both supported the U.S.-backed ouster of the Taliban in 2001, and Iran was the chief benefactor of the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance.

But Iran and Russia eventually soured on the U.S. presence, which they both gradually saw as a threat.

“Iran is worried that with American troops in Afghanistan, the two militaries will end up confronting each other,” said Mohammad Akram Arefi, an Iranian-educated professor of politics at Kateb University in Kabul.

“Iran also wants to revive its power in the region by having influence over Afghanistan. And with America here, they can’t have the type of influence they want,” he said.

Russia, which also sees Afghanistan as part of its sphere of influence in Central Asia, has suggested that the Taliban is an effective bulwark against the rise of the Islamic State. A local branch of the Islamic State has staged deadly attacks but has struggled to gain a foothold beyond its base in eastern Afghanistan.

[Afghanistan wooed a fugitive warlord, aiming to lure the Taliban, too. Now the deal is stuck.]

In a swipe at the legitimacy of the Afghan government, Russia has questioned security forces’ abilities to target the group. Still, Iran and Russia have both denied providing the Taliban with weapons or cash.

In an emailed statement this week, the Russian Embassy in Kabul said that the claims were “absurd fabrications” designed to distract from the failure of the U.S. and NATO missions here.

There is “a continuing series of groundless accusations against Russia about alleged support of the Taliban,” the embassy said.

A Taliban spokesman also called the allegations untrue.

“Our contacts with Russia are for political and diplomatic purposes only,” spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said in a phone interview. He did not say whether Taliban representatives would attend the Moscow talks.

But U.S. and Afghan officials say that the relationship between Russia, Iran and the Taliban goes beyond just diplomacy, and that conflict with the United States elsewhere could prompt Iran and Russia to raise the stakes here.

Afghan lawmakers have launched a probe into the alleged connections, including possible Iranian-Russian coordination to get weapons to insurgents in restive provinces in the south and the west.

Gul Ahmad Azami is an Afghan senator from Farah province, along the Iranian border. He says he was briefed on reports showing weapons that had been transported into Farah from Iran, in part to ensure the allegiance of local commanders. Officials in Kabul, Helmand, Uruzgan and Herat all made similar claims.

In Helmand province in the south, provincial governor Hayatullah Hayat listed the type of weaponry he says local insurgents receive from Russia with Iran’s help. The list includes land mines, sniper rifles, rocket-propelled grenades and 82mm mortar rounds.

“There is no doubt” the two countries are helping the Taliban, said Hayat, who said he, too, was briefed by intelligence officials.

He claimed that Iranian advisers have been present on the battlefield, also citing intelligence reports and tribal elders in districts where there is fighting. The police chief in Uruzgan province, Ghulam Farooq Sangari, also told the Voice of America’s Afghan service that Russian advisers were assisting insurgents there, too.

[Afghan government disappoints many, but some cling to hope]

Neither of those claims could be verified, and U.S. military officials have not said whether Iranian and Russian personnel have been on the ground. But the assertions indicate the extent to which the debate over Russian and Iranian influence has dominated Afghanistan in recent weeks.

“We are worried that Afghanistan will become another Syria, with world powers confronting each other here,” said Azami, the senator from Farah.

While President Trump has taken a harsh stance on Iran, he has said little about what he envisions for the U.S. role in Afghanistan. In just the past several days, U.S.-Russian relations plummeted after a U.S. missile strike last week on a Syrian military air base. The U.S. administration says the air base was used to launch aircraft that allegedly carried out an April 4 chemical weapons attack that killed dozens of civilians in Syria’s Idlib province.

The state of U.S., Russian and Iranian relations will determine Afghanistan’s stability, officials here say.

“First, people are concerned now about how Americans view Afghanistan, and whether or not they will change their minds about supporting us,” said Mohammad Nateqi, an adviser at the office of Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah.

“The relationship between Afghanistan, the United States, and NATO has been very strong,” said Nateqi, who spent decades in Iran. “But if there are bad relations between Iran, the United States and Russia, it will be very dangerous for us.”

Sayed Salahuddin and Walid Sharif contributed to this report.

Read more:

John McCain and Lindsey Graham: Why we need more forces to end the stalemate in Afghanistan

U.S. strike kills an al-Qaeda ‘leader’ in Afghanistan, Pentagon says

No, we don’t need more U.S. forces in Afghanistan

Today’s coverage from Post correspondents around the world

Like Washington Post World on Facebook and stay updated on foreign news

It's only fair to share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Read Kimberly's latest article discussing daily headlines

The Prophet Elijah & Russia’s New Proxy Battleground Against The United States

Beast Watch News Brief – Podcast Russia and the United States now have a new proxy battleground in Afghanistan. Russia is working to create an… Read More

0 comments

Kimberly’s News Picks – 05/24/2017

ISRAEL  Trump Becomes First Sitting U.S. President to Visit Western Wall President Donald Trump placed a note in the Western Wall in Jerusalem on Monday,… Read More

0 comments